NUPL urges immediate COMELEC action: red-tagging is an offense against suffrage
The NUPL urges the COMELEC to exercise its full authority under Resolution No. 11116 and impose immediate sanctions on officials and state actors involved in red-tagging. An independent investigation must be conducted into the use of public funds for this illegal operation, particularly the involvement of the NTF-ELCAC and its network of state-aligned groups.
March 10, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL) fully supports Bayan Muna Partylist’s call for an urgent investigation into the systematic red-tagging of progressive candidates, a practice that threatens lives and subverts the integrity of the elections. The formal complaint filed today with the Commission on Elections (COMELEC) demands accountability for what is not just political harassment, but a state-sanctioned assault on suffrage and democratic participation.

The Supreme Court, in Deduro v. Maj. Gen. Vinoya (G.R. No. 254753, 2023), has ruled that red-tagging is a grave violation of constitutional rights that exposes individuals to harassment, illegal arrests, enforced disappearances, and even extrajudicial killings. COMELEC Resolution No. 11116 explicitly prohibits red-tagging as an election offense, recognizing that it distorts public perception and creates a climate of fear that suppresses legitimate political discourse. However, despite these clear legal prohibitions, state-backed forces continue to deploy red-tagging as a weapon to silence opposition and manipulate electoral outcomes.

The nationwide black propaganda campaign against Bayan Muna and other progressive candidates is not random; it is a well-funded, coordinated effort that reeks of government complicity. The mass production and circulation of defamatory materials targeting specific candidates indicate the misuse of public resources to interfere in the elections. Instead of allowing voters to decide freely, those in power resort to fear-mongering and disinformation, violating the people’s right to an informed vote.

Red-tagging is election sabotage. It is not just an attack on progressive candidates but an assault on the people’s right to freely choose their leaders. By falsely branding candidates as ‘communist sympathizers’ or ‘terrorists,’ red-taggers are not only putting lives in danger—they are depriving the electorate of the chance to vote based on truth and genuine political platforms.

The NUPL urges the COMELEC to exercise its full authority under Resolution No. 11116 and impose immediate sanctions on officials and state actors involved in red-tagging. An independent investigation must be conducted into the use of public funds for this illegal operation, particularly the involvement of the NTF-ELCAC and its network of state-aligned groups. The public must also reject these dirty tactics and demand accountability from those who use state power and resources to manipulate the people’s vote.

Reference:
Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Photo taken from Facebook Live of Atty. Neri Colminares.

Read more

Hands off NUPL Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and PDG development workers! – NUPL

Hands off NUPL Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and PDG development workers! – NUPL

These attacks against Atty. Gorgonio and his clients, whom the military has labeled as “high value individuals,” are part of the continuing weaponization of counterterrorism measures against development workers and human rights defenders. They create a chilling climate meant to intimidate and hinder human rights lawyers from independently performing their duties and providing legal services without fear.

On the Conviction of Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil for Terrorism Financing

On the Conviction of Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil for Terrorism Financing

For human rights defenders, humanitarian and religious workers, development NGO personnel, journalists, and community organizers, the unmistakable message is that legitimate social engagement and protected civic activity may be recast by the State as terrorism financing through broad and elastic standards untethered from real acts of terrorism. This shows how terror laws in the Philippines, by their nature and design, chill speech, deter association, and shrink civic space.

Share This