IHL as cover: Marcos Jr. government masks systematic atrocities behind “leadership” claim
Genuine adherence to IHL cannot be achieved by hollow speeches and summits, but the immediate cessation of attacks on protected persons, the dismantling of policies like NAP-UPD that institutionalize these abuses, and the prosecution of state forces and senior officials responsible for them
August 16, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

August 15, 2025

The Philippine government’s much-publicized hosting of the Asia Pacific Regional Conference on International Humanitarian Law (IHL) is presented as proof of a supposed “enduring commitment” to the laws of war and the protection of civilians. In truth, it is designed to conceal the state’s own record as the leading perpetrator of IHL violations in the country.

Under the Marcos Jr. administration, the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP), through the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) and its National Action Plan on Unity, Peace, and Development (NAP-UPD), has carried out systematic attacks on rural and indigenous communities: aerial bombardments and artillery shelling of civilian areas, strafing and indiscriminate firing, forced evacuations, encampments in homes, schools, and barangay halls, extrajudicial killings of unarmed civilians and hors de combat, desecration and withholding of remains from families, and harassment of humanitarian missions.

These are not “isolated incidents” but deliberate operations under a counterinsurgency policy that erases the line between civilian and combatant. In the process, treaty obligations are emptied of meaning as entire communities are branded and targeted as “enemies.”

The government’s refusal to reaffirm the Comprehensive Agreement on Respect for Human Rights and International Humanitarian Law (CARHRIHL) further exposes the hollowness of its IHL rhetoric. The same government that invokes Geneva Conventions before diplomats dismisses the CARHRIHL at home, as if the IHL protections under both instruments were negotiable depending on the audience.

The killing of Juan Sumilhig, a Maranao farmer and former political prisoner, by soldiers of the 4th Infantry Battalion (IB) in Occidental Mindoro, and the military’s refusal to release his body to his family, demonstrates the state’s contempt for IHL. In Quezon province, bombardments and military occupations in Tagkawayan this August continue a years-long siege on farming communities in the Bondoc Peninsula.

Equally emblematic is the unresolved murder of Jay-el Maligday, a young indigenous rights advocate executed in cold blood by soldiers of the 4th IB. Despite eyewitness accounts and formal complaints against commanding officers, the perpetrators remain unpunished.

International humanitarian law binds the state above all, as it claims the monopoly of legitimate force and exercises the power to ratify treaties and enact enabling laws. When it weaponizes the nation’s resources against its own people, it does not merely violate IHL—it undermines the very legal order it professes to defend.

What is taking place in Makati’s air-conditioned conference halls is not a reaffirmation of IHL, but its appropriation to cover up its violations of the rules of war. Genuine adherence to IHL cannot be achieved by hollow speeches and summits, but the immediate cessation of attacks on protected persons, the dismantling of policies like NAP-UPD that institutionalize these abuses, and the prosecution of state forces and senior officials responsible for them. ###

Reference:
Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

Defend the youth speaking against injustice, corruption, and red-tagging

Defend the youth speaking against injustice, corruption, and red-tagging

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers-National Capital Region (NUPL-NCR) stands with youth activists and their fundamental right to free speech and expression. NUPL-NCR assisted youth leader Christian Mataverde on October 20, 2026 as he filed his counter-affidavit before the Office of the Provincial Prosecutor of Rizal in the cyberlibel complaint brought against him by an official of the University of Rizal System (URS), Pililla Campus, for violation of Section 4(c)(4) of Republic Act No. 10175 or the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. Cyberlibel potentially carries the penalty of up to eight years in prison.

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Raven Kristine Racelis, Ralph Christian Manuel, Mecaella Sean Carl Capalar, and Dex Anderson Frogoso, represented by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) and the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), asked the Office of the Rector to reverse and set aside the separate resolutions issued by the UST Office for Student Affairs on October 2. They also sought an urgent stay of their suspensions and all related sanctions while the appeal is pending.

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL President Atty. Ephraim Cortez speaks outside the Court of Appeals on September 29, 2026, following the filing of a motion seeking reconsideration of the transfer to Cebu of the amparo and habeas data proceedings involving NUPL–Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and three development workers of the Paghida-et sa Kauswagan Development Group (PDG).

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

Under Trump’s Executive Order No. 14203, the designation subjects the ICC to US financial sanctions that threaten to restrict its access to American banks, technology, and other essential services. Given the United States’ influence over the global financial system, these restrictions could disrupt the Court’s operations, including investigations, witness protection, and even the delivery of assistance and reparations to victims.

Share This