On the US Assault on Venezuela and the Erosion of International Law
We likewise call on lawyers’ organizations, human rights institutions, and all freedom-loving peoples to stand with the people of Venezuela and mobilize public pressure against this unlawful assault. The task before us is to resist imperial violence and the rule of force—firmly, collectively, and with an unambiguous commitment to the rule of law and the right of all peoples to determine their own future.
January 7, 2026
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

Press Statement
January 6, 2026

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) condemns the United States’ 3 January 2026 military operation in Venezuela—air strikes in Caracas followed by the forcible capture and removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro Moros and his wife, Cilia Flores, to New York to face U.S. criminal charges. This is a naked act of aggression, a familiar exercise of power driven by economic greed and contempt for international norms.

For decades, US oil corporations have openly coveted Venezuela’s vast petroleum reserves. The present assault strips away any remaining pretense. It is imperial greed in plain view—armed force deployed to secure what markets and diplomacy could not. The rhetoric of “security,” “law enforcement,” and “narco-terrorism” merely masks an old reality: control over strategic resources continues to shape US policy, especially against states that insist on an independent political and economic path.

This assault also lays bare the nature of alliances with an imperial power that treats nations as expendable instruments and treats their resources as spoils. Venezuela was met with overwhelming military force for refusing to submit to US political and economic dictates and for pursuing independent alliances. And if this is how the US deals with a government that refuses to submit, what protection exists for client regimes that depend on subservience? A puppet is useful only while the strings remain intact. Any sustained departure from US demands renders it expendable.

For the Philippines, the implications are stark. A government that readily opens the country’s territory, resources, and security policy to foreign use should take heed. Through arrangements such as the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), the Philippines is being positioned as a staging ground for US force projection in the region. Such compliance with US strategic interests buys only continued usefulness. When a client state ceases to be useful—or begins to diverge from the US agenda—political backing is withdrawn and punitive measures follow. The harm is borne by the people, not by those who struck the bargains.

Most alarming is the utter disregard for international law. The prohibition against the use of force, the principle of non-intervention, and respect for state sovereignty under the UN Charter are binding rules meant to restrain precisely this kind of unilateral violence. Their violation undermines the fragile legal order that smaller nations rely on, at the very least, for a minimum restraint on the use of force.

As peoples’ lawyers, we call on the international community—most especially the UN#—to act with the urgency this crisis demands. The UN system’s delayed and constrained response, shaped by the veto power of the strongest states, only deepens the long held reality that accountability under international law is applied unevenly when powerful states are involved.

We likewise call on lawyers’ organizations, human rights institutions, and all freedom-loving peoples to stand with the people of Venezuela and mobilize public pressure against this unlawful assault. The task before us is to resist imperial violence and the rule of force—firmly, collectively, and with an unambiguous commitment to the rule of law and the right of all peoples to determine their own future.

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Raven Kristine Racelis, Ralph Christian Manuel, Mecaella Sean Carl Capalar, and Dex Anderson Frogoso, represented by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) and the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), asked the Office of the Rector to reverse and set aside the separate resolutions issued by the UST Office for Student Affairs on October 2. They also sought an urgent stay of their suspensions and all related sanctions while the appeal is pending.

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL President Atty. Ephraim Cortez speaks outside the Court of Appeals on September 29, 2026, following the filing of a motion seeking reconsideration of the transfer to Cebu of the amparo and habeas data proceedings involving NUPL–Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and three development workers of the Paghida-et sa Kauswagan Development Group (PDG).

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

Under Trump’s Executive Order No. 14203, the designation subjects the ICC to US financial sanctions that threaten to restrict its access to American banks, technology, and other essential services. Given the United States’ influence over the global financial system, these restrictions could disrupt the Court’s operations, including investigations, witness protection, and even the delivery of assistance and reparations to victims.

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

The Philippine Air Force has no problem displaying weapons on a university campus, yet apparently cannot stomach sharp questions protests from students about military operations and civilian casualties. Even the University of Santo Tomas (UST) disciplinary resolution notes that PAF personnel themselves considered the students’ questions valid. What offended them, it seems, was the students’ supposedly rude manner.

Share This