STATEMENT ON THE AFP BOMBING OF MINDORO AND THE ENFORCED DISAPPEARANCE OF CHANTAL ANICOCHE
I therefore join the urgent calls to immediately surface Chantal Anicoche, lift the military blockade in Abra de Ilog, and allow independent investigations and humanitarian access. withdraw military forces from civilian and indigenous communities in Mindoro, and end foreign military support that enables human rights violations in the Philippines.
January 13, 2026
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

PRESS STATEMENT
January 9, 2026

I strongly condemn the aerial bombardment and sustained military assault conducted by the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) on 1 January 2026, against the civilian population of Barangay Cabacao, Abra de Ilog, Occidental Mindoro. The reported deployment of attack helicopters, aerial bombing, and hours-long strafing constitutes a grave violation of international humanitarian law, particularly the principles of distinction, proportionality, and protection of civilians.

The Philippine government is beholden to the four Geneva Conventions of 1949, Additional Protocol II, and established customary international humanitarian law, as authoritatively reflected in the ICRC Commentaries and customary law study. As a State Party, the Philippine government is legally bound not only to respect these norms but also to ensure their effective implementation by its armed forces; failure to do so engages both state responsibility and individual criminal accountability.

Credible reports show that the attack killed three Mangyan children, injured their mother, and forcibly displaced at least 188 families. It also resulted in the deaths of student researchers integrating with the community, including Jerlyn Rose Doydora, who reportedly died while fleeing the bombardment. These atrocities reflect the continuing pattern of militarization and human rights violations in Mindoro, where tens of thousands of victims have already been documented in 2025 alone.

Even if the AFP’s claim that the attack was part of an “encounter” with the New People’s Army was true, aerial bombing in civilian-populated and indigenous areas is patently unlawful. Civilians are not legitimate military targets, and the Philippine government and the AFP bear the obligation to ensure their protection—an obligation they have repeatedly failed to uphold.

Of utmost urgency is the disappearance of Chantal Anicoche, a 24-year-old Filipina community leader from the United States who was present in Abra de Ilog during the attack. Her whereabouts and condition remain unknown. Chantal was in Mindoro to learn from Mangyan communities about their struggles against environmental destruction, poverty, and militarization. The failure of the AFP and the Philippine government to account for her fate raises serious concern of enforced disappearance, a crime under international law.

Equally alarming are reports that the AFP and the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) are prohibiting independent fact-finding missions and humanitarian assistance. This blockade deepens civilian suffering and points to a deliberate effort to evade accountability and scrutiny.

I therefore join the urgent calls to immediately surface Chantal Anicoche, lift the military blockade in Abra de Ilog, and allow independent investigations and humanitarian access. withdraw military forces from civilian and indigenous communities in Mindoro, and end foreign military support that enables human rights violations in the Philippines.

This attack on our communities on New Year’s Day reminds us that the struggle for people’s rights continues into 2026—and will persist until justice is achieved.

ATTY. EDRE U. OLALIA
President
International Association of Democratic Lawyers (IADL)

Chairperson
National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL)

Read more

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Raven Kristine Racelis, Ralph Christian Manuel, Mecaella Sean Carl Capalar, and Dex Anderson Frogoso, represented by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) and the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), asked the Office of the Rector to reverse and set aside the separate resolutions issued by the UST Office for Student Affairs on October 2. They also sought an urgent stay of their suspensions and all related sanctions while the appeal is pending.

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL President Atty. Ephraim Cortez speaks outside the Court of Appeals on September 29, 2026, following the filing of a motion seeking reconsideration of the transfer to Cebu of the amparo and habeas data proceedings involving NUPL–Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and three development workers of the Paghida-et sa Kauswagan Development Group (PDG).

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

Under Trump’s Executive Order No. 14203, the designation subjects the ICC to US financial sanctions that threaten to restrict its access to American banks, technology, and other essential services. Given the United States’ influence over the global financial system, these restrictions could disrupt the Court’s operations, including investigations, witness protection, and even the delivery of assistance and reparations to victims.

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

The Philippine Air Force has no problem displaying weapons on a university campus, yet apparently cannot stomach sharp questions protests from students about military operations and civilian casualties. Even the University of Santo Tomas (UST) disciplinary resolution notes that PAF personnel themselves considered the students’ questions valid. What offended them, it seems, was the students’ supposedly rude manner.

Share This