On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act
The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.
June 1, 2026
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

Press Statement

June 1, 2026

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) expresses its profound disappointment over the Decision dated April 30, 2026 of the Baguio City Regional Trial Court, Branch 78, denying the Petition for Certiorari filed by Cordillera Peoples Alliance (CPA) Chairperson Windel Bolinget, founding member Sarah Alikes, Research Commission member Jennifer Taggaoa, and Regional Council member Stephen Tauli.

The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

In dismissing the petition, the RTC rigidly adhered to Calleja v. Executive Secretary, applying the doctrine of stare decisis et non quieta movere to a context fundamentally distinct from the instant as-applied challenge. With all due respect, the Court totally ignored the Supreme Court’s categorical pronouncement in Calleja v. Executive Secretary: that its resolution on the constitutional issues raised on a facial challenge is without prejudice to the determination of the same constitutional issues raised in an as-applied challenge once the law is implemented. Consequently, the Supreme Court explicitly preserved, rather than foreclosed, an effective judicial remedy for any violations arising from the law’s enforcement.

The Decision denies petitioners effective judicial review despite clear evidence of serious constitutional infringements. Crucially, it fails to reckon with the profound implications of terrorist designation, including the suppression of lawful advocacy, the curtailment of basic liberties, severe reputational damage, and the persistent specter of criminal liability.

Furthermore, the court placed undue reliance on the testimony of a solitary military witness, accepting allegations that were entirely unsubstantiated by independent, credible, or corroborative evidence. 

At stake in this case is not merely the fate of four indigenous rights defenders. What is at stake is whether our constitutional order will tolerate a standing mechanism of repression—one cloaked in the language of counterterrorism but untethered from meaningful safeguards, due process, and judicial accountability. 

Reference

Ephraim B. Cortez

NUPL President

09172092943

Julianne B. Agpalo

09178870776

Photo Credit: Northern Dispatch

Read more

In the Service of the Filipino People

In the Service of the Filipino People

NUPL Vice President Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen and Secretary General Atty. Josa Deinla with lawyers from the Kennedy Human Rights Center and Kerry Kennedy at the Capitol in Washington D.C.

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

The Philippine government finds paths only to new methods of repression and enforces the peace of the grave at home. Human rights monitors, including Karapatan, document a continuing pattern of violence: extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and widespread attacks on rural communities. On April 19, state forces killed 19 people in Toboso, Negros Occidental, including civilians standing in solidarity with farmers asserting their land rights.

NUPL Demands Investigation and Accountability for PNP Davao Oriental’s Arbitrary “Active Wanted Persons” Labeling of Southern Mindanao Rights Defenders

NUPL Demands Investigation and Accountability for PNP Davao Oriental’s Arbitrary “Active Wanted Persons” Labeling of Southern Mindanao Rights Defenders

On May 27, 2026, the PNP Cateel station posted on its official Facebook page the photographs of KARAPATAN-Southern Mindanao Region Deputy Secretary General Grecian Gasoy, along with known rights leaders from Kabataan Partylist and Gabriela Youth, with captions suggesting criminal liability. The posts have since been taken down, but their removal does not erase the danger they created, nor the accountability that must follow.

Share This