Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil Question the Unjust Denial of their Application for Bail Pending Appeal
Frenchie and Marielle continue to maintain their innocence and assert that the charges filed against them form part of a broader pattern of harassment, red-tagging, and criminalization directed against journalists, activists, humanitarian workers, and human rights defenders in the Philippines.
May 26, 2026
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

Press Statement

May 26, 2026

Community journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio and lay worker Marielle Domequil have filed a Petition for Certiorari before the Court of Appeals questioning the Tacloban Regional Trial Court’s denial of their application for bail pending appeal, arguing that the ruling constitutes a grave violation of their constitutional rights to liberty, due process, and meaningful appellate review.

In their Petition, Frenchie and Marielle assert that the trial court failed to undertake the careful, individualized, and evidence-based determination required by the Constitution before depriving persons of their liberty pending appeal. Instead of assessing whether the evidence of guilt against them was truly strong, the ss court merely relied on its own judgment of conviction despite the fact that the decision remains under appellate review and has not attained finality.

Frenchie and Marielle continue to maintain their innocence and assert that the charges filed against them form part of a broader pattern of harassment, red-tagging, and criminalization directed against journalists, activists, humanitarian workers, and human rights defenders in the Philippines.

Significantly, prior judicial findings in related proceedings directly contradict the State’s portrayal of Frenchie and Marielle as threats to public order or national security. Both were acquitted of the charge of illegal possession of firearms and explosives after the court itself found serious constitutional violations in the conduct of the search, opportunities for evidence planting, and critical evidentiary infirmities. In the same judgment, the Tacloban court categorically found no basis to conclude that they were engaged in money laundering or terrorism financing activities.

Their innocence is further reinforced when the Court of Appeals reversed the civil forfeiture ruling against them, expressly recognizing that Frenchie and Marielle are human rights advocates and ruling that the funds illegally seized from them were not connected to terrorism financing.

These judicial findings expose the weakness of the state’s case and underscore the substantial and meritorious nature of their pending appeal.

Hence, Frenchie and Marielle’s continued imprisonment for an otherwise bailable offense is not demanded by the public interest. Rather than protecting society, their prolonged detention inflicts irreparable harm on constitutionally protected freedoms, including press freedom, humanitarian work, and civic participation.

The National Union of Peoples Lawyers calls on the courts to uphold constitutional rights, protect meaningful judicial review, and ensure that liberty is not curtailed on the basis of fear, political stigma, or unfounded allegations. #

📷  Photo credit: FORUM ASIA

Read more

In the Service of the Filipino People

In the Service of the Filipino People

NUPL Vice President Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen and Secretary General Atty. Josa Deinla with lawyers from the Kennedy Human Rights Center and Kerry Kennedy at the Capitol in Washington D.C.

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

The Philippine government finds paths only to new methods of repression and enforces the peace of the grave at home. Human rights monitors, including Karapatan, document a continuing pattern of violence: extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and widespread attacks on rural communities. On April 19, state forces killed 19 people in Toboso, Negros Occidental, including civilians standing in solidarity with farmers asserting their land rights.

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

Share This