Court of Appeals: No Legal Basis for Civil Forfeiture Against Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil
The Court’s decision is a clear rebuke of the misuse of counterterrorism laws to suppress activism, journalism, and humanitarian work. It affirms that defending human rights and reporting the truth are not crimes.
November 6, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) welcomes the Court of Appeals’ landmark Decision dated October 29, 2025, which categorically held that there was no factual and legal basis to forfeit the funds seized from journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio and lay worker Marielle Domequil.

In CA-G.R. CV No. 124860, the Court of Appeals (Third Division) reversed and set aside the ruling of the Regional Trial Court, Branch 18, Manila, dated December 7, 2022, which had ordered the forfeiture of ₱557,360 seized during the 2020 raid and arrest of Cumpio and Domequil in Tacloban City.

In nullifying the forfeiture, the appellate court made the following key findings:

  1. The Anti-Money Laundering Council (AMLC), failed to: a) establish that the seized funds were related to or intended to finance terrorism; b) prove that Cumpio and Domequil were designated or proscribed individuals under the law; and c) establish any link between Cumpio and Domequil and the Communist Party of the Philippines-New People’s Army (CPP-NPA).
  2. The Court found proof and indications that Cumpio and Domequil were gainfully employed—Cumpio as a journalist and Executive Director of Eastern Vista, and Domequil as a lay worker of the Rural Missionaries of the Philippines (RMP)—“who had been actively participating in the efforts to improve the plight of human rights victims in Samar.”
  3. The Court clarified that under the Anti-Terrorism Act (ATA) and its Implementing Rules, the AMLC may only conduct a “permissible investigation” into properties or funds of designated or proscribed individuals and organizations.

Since Cumpio and Domequil were neither designated nor proscribed, and there was no evidence that they were linked to any such organization, the AMLC’s investigation and the subsequent forfeiture case were impermissible and unlawful.

  1. Under these circumstances, the Court held that there was no factual and legal basis for the forfeiture of the funds.

In a strongly worded caution, the Court of Appeals emphasized:

“The Court cannot countenance the hasty labelling of human rights advocates as terrorists and the speedy confiscation of their funds and property in the name of national security. Measures to counter terrorism must not be done without due process, and at the expense of individuals, groups, and civil society organizations that are engaged in the promotion and defense of human rights… To permit the forfeiture of property and funds without strict observance of the guidelines laid down in the ATA, the ATA-IRR, and other relevant laws, would thus be tantamount to committing the evil which the ATA sought to avoid. It would erode the public’s trust in the state’s capacity to manage threats to national security and address the causes of terrorism.”

The Court’s decision is a clear rebuke of the misuse of counterterrorism laws to suppress activism, journalism, and humanitarian work. It affirms that defending human rights and reporting the truth are not crimes.

This victory belongs not only to Frenchie and Marielle, but to all journalists, church workers, and human rights advocates whose commitment to truth and justice persists amid persecution. ###

Read more

Court Voids NTC Blocking Memo: Prior Restraint of Protected Speech Has No Place in a Democracy

Court Voids NTC Blocking Memo: Prior Restraint of Protected Speech Has No Place in a Democracy

We therefore call on the people to treat this ruling as a mandate to insist on a press that can report and publish without fear of being taken down, and on a citizenry free to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas across all frontiers. A democracy worthy of the name rests on people who are able to think, speak, debate, and dissent—with journalists and communities prepared to resist censorship and repression whenever they appear, online or offline.

STATEMENT: UPLM vows to continue the fight against warlordism and state-sanctioned impunity – MindaNews

The massacre and the massive corruption are fruits from the same poisonous tree. The tree is a system where power is treated as a personal inheritance, state resources as a private treasury, and the law as a weapon against the people rather than a shield for them. The warlord who orders a massacre to secure an election and the official who diverts billions from the public coffers operate on the same core belief: that they are above the law.

Do Not Rehabilitate Martial Law: Enrile Does Not Belong at the Libingan ng mga Bayani — NUPL

Do Not Mistake Criticism for Crime —NUPL

The recent statements from the DILG foreshadow more aggressive attempts to restrict public assembly ahead of the Baha sa Luneta 2.0 mobilization on November 30, where thousands are expected to gather once again to press for accountability. If the pattern holds, the State may again resort to brutality and violations of basic rights in an effort to suppress protected acts of discontent and dissent.

Share This