LUDICROUS!!!
Using the perjured statements of military assets, the government alleged that the Cagayan Valley activists supplied rice to NPA rebels by burying the rice in the hinterlands of Cagayan. The military assets allegedly provided the information to locate the place where the rice were buried. These were excavated, and the rotten rice is being used as a basis to file the case for terrorist financing.
September 3, 2026
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

LEGAL POINT OF VIEW

By Atty. Ephraim Cortez

Ludicrous! This is how I describe the newest terrorist financing case filed against the 11 activists from Cagayan Valley. 

Using the perjured statements of military assets, the government alleged that the Cagayan Valley activists supplied rice to NPA rebels by burying the rice in the hinterlands of Cagayan. The military assets allegedly provided the information to locate the place where the rice were buried. These were excavated, and the rotten rice is being used as a basis to file the case for terrorist financing.

The fabricated charges are based on the same badly written and discredited script that the government concocted and has been using to file trumped-up charges for terrorist financing.

They used the same script to charge an activist from Southern Tagalog, claiming that she gave adobo and cooked rice to NPA rebels. The DOJ National Prosecution Service found probable cause and indicted her for terrorist financing. A court in Batangas dismissed the case for lack of probable cause.

This case is more ludicrous than the adobo and rice case. The rice was never delivered to its supposed recipient. It remained buried from 2019 until it was excavated in 2026. By then, the rice was no longer edible. 

The government’s scriptwriters are “writing for fools”, and the charges are obviously shallow, and no right-minded individual would believe them, except, maybe, the prosecutors of the National Prosecution Service.

We hope that the investigating prosecutor assigned to this case will be critical enough to see through the shallowness of the charges and dismiss the case.

Read more

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

The Philippine Air Force has no problem displaying weapons on a university campus, yet apparently cannot stomach sharp questions protests from students about military operations and civilian casualties. Even the University of Santo Tomas (UST) disciplinary resolution notes that PAF personnel themselves considered the students’ questions valid. What offended them, it seems, was the students’ supposedly rude manner.

NUPL Files Motion to Keep Gorgonio, PDG Case in Manila

NUPL Files Motion to Keep Gorgonio, PDG Case in Manila

The motion asks the Court to reconsider its September 23 Resolution forwarding the case records to the CA Visayas Station in Cebu. It asks that the case remain in Manila, where the Supreme Court directed the respondents to file their returns.

LTFRB Must Not Weaponize Franchises Against Peaceful Protest

LTFRB Must Not Weaponize Franchises Against Peaceful Protest

The government has a duty to protect commuters and ensure adequate transportation. It should meet that duty through lawful contingency measures, meaningful dialogue, and concrete action on the conditions driving transport workers and operators to protest—not by threatening their livelihoods.

Share This