NUPL Condemns New Sedition and Rebellion Charges as Part of the State’s Escalating Criminalization of Dissent
We call on the Department of Justice to immediately dismiss these fabricated and baseless complaints, and on the public, especially members of the legal profession, to resist the normalization of repression and defend the right to dissent.
November 5, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) condemns m the filing of sedition, rebellion, and related charges by the Criminal Investigation and Detection Group (CIDG) against nearly one hundred individuals who joined the September 21 anti-corruption mobilizations in Manila.

From the violent dispersal and arbitrary arrests of protesters to the filing of grave criminal charges, the state’s entire response has been a continuing act of repression and the criminalization of dissent. The September 21 protests were legitimate exercises of democratic participation and the people’s collective will, yet the government has answered these demands for accountability with intimidation, harassment, and the brazen use of the justice system as an instrument of fear.

The NUPL also takes note of the earlier CIDG subpoenas issued to youth activists and student leaders, including UP Diliman University Student Council Chairperson Joaquin Buenaflor and PUP Sentral na Konseho ng Mag-aaral President Tiffany Brillante. While it remains unclear if they are among those charged, their targeting and surveillance reveal a systematic effort to intimidate and isolate a new generation of critics. These young leaders have rightfully invoked their constitutional protections by refusing to submit to interrogations masquerading as “invitations,” asserting their right to counsel and due process.

We recall that many of the cases filed against protesters in earlier incidents have already been dismissed at the preliminary investigation stage. Their dismissal exposes the flimsiness of police allegations and the political motives driving these latest attempts at prosecution. However, looking at who has been charged—the critics and not the corrupt—it is clear that the state is deliberately chilling the people into silence and submission.

This weaponization of the legal system revives the same patterns of abuse that the nation supposedly swore to reject after the dark years of dictatorship.

We call on the Department of Justice to immediately dismiss these fabricated and baseless complaints, and on the public, especially members of the legal profession, to resist the normalization of repression and defend the right to dissent.

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

In the Service of the Filipino People

In the Service of the Filipino People

NUPL Vice President Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen and Secretary General Atty. Josa Deinla with lawyers from the Kennedy Human Rights Center and Kerry Kennedy at the Capitol in Washington D.C.

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

The Philippine government finds paths only to new methods of repression and enforces the peace of the grave at home. Human rights monitors, including Karapatan, document a continuing pattern of violence: extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and widespread attacks on rural communities. On April 19, state forces killed 19 people in Toboso, Negros Occidental, including civilians standing in solidarity with farmers asserting their land rights.

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

Share This