NUPL stands with Jhed Tamano and Jonila Castro in their pursuit of justice
Jonila and Jhed’s decision to pursue countercharges is not merely a step toward their personal vindication but a powerful statement against the forces that seek to silence dissent. It serves as a call for accountability and the protection of human rights defenders who continue to advocate for marginalized communities and environmental justice.
December 5, 2024
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

PRESS STATEMENT
December 5, 2024

We stand in solidarity with Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano, two courageous environmental rights defenders who have taken a stand against impunity by filing countercharges with the Office of the Ombudsman against the perpetrators of their abduction and illegal detention. Assisted by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL), Jhed and Jonila seek justice under the Anti-Enforced or Involuntary Disappearance Act (R.A. No. 10353), the Anti-Torture Act (R.A. No. 9745), and other relevant laws.

As advocates for the coastal communities impacted by reclamation projects in Manila Bay, Jhed and Jonila were abducted on September 2, 2023, and endured 17 harrowing days of captivity, during which they were subjected to egregious abuses, including psychological torment, coercion, and threats.

Among those named in their complaint* are high-ranking officials and operatives from government-linked agencies, including Jonathan Malaya of the National Security Council, Lt. Col. Ronnel B. Dela Cruz of the 70th Infantry Battalion, Lt. Col. Mario Jose “Emjay” Chico of the NTF-ELCAC, P/Capt. Carlito Buco of the Bataan Provincial Police Office, and Lt. Sherwin C. Momo, along with other personnel from the 70th Infantry Battalion of the Philippine Army. These individuals are also facing administrative charges for grave misconduct and conduct prejudicial to the public service.

Despite the Court of Appeals’ denial of their petitions for the privilege of amparo and habeas data, Jhed and Jonila remain resolute in their pursuit of justice and accountability. Their bravery highlights the urgent need to address the systemic abuse of power and culture of impunity that allow such grievous acts to persist. Their abduction demonstrates the alarming risks faced by environmental and human rights defenders in the Philippines, which remains one of the world’s most dangerous countries for such advocacy.

Jonila and Jhed’s decision to pursue countercharges is not merely a step toward their personal vindication but a powerful statement against the forces that seek to silence dissent. It serves as a call for accountability and the protection of human rights defenders who continue to advocate for marginalized communities and environmental justice.

The NUPL echoes their call for justice and demands the immediate suspension and removal of the implicated officials pending investigation. #

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

*Copy available upon request

Read more

Hands off NUPL Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and PDG development workers! – NUPL

Hands off NUPL Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and PDG development workers! – NUPL

These attacks against Atty. Gorgonio and his clients, whom the military has labeled as “high value individuals,” are part of the continuing weaponization of counterterrorism measures against development workers and human rights defenders. They create a chilling climate meant to intimidate and hinder human rights lawyers from independently performing their duties and providing legal services without fear.

On the Conviction of Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil for Terrorism Financing

On the Conviction of Frenchie Mae Cumpio and Marielle Domequil for Terrorism Financing

For human rights defenders, humanitarian and religious workers, development NGO personnel, journalists, and community organizers, the unmistakable message is that legitimate social engagement and protected civic activity may be recast by the State as terrorism financing through broad and elastic standards untethered from real acts of terrorism. This shows how terror laws in the Philippines, by their nature and design, chill speech, deter association, and shrink civic space.

Share This