On DOJ’s grandstanding narrative regarding financing terrorism charges vs. CERNET
The DOJ must be reminded of its ethical duty: prosecutors are entrusted not with securing convictions at all costs, but with ensuring that justice is served. This means upholding the principles of fairness, due process, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The use of fabricated evidence and the solicitation of false testimony constitute not only ethical violations but egregious affronts to justice.
May 23, 2024
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The recent press statement issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning the filing of criminal charges for financing terrorism against Community Empowerment Resource Network, Inc. (CERNET) and its officers is a marching order to wield Republic Act No. 10168, the law ostensibly enacted to combat terrorism financing, as a blunt instrument against progressive civil society organizations (CSOs) and development workers.

While the DOJ has a mandate to prosecute crimes, the tone and substance of Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin C. Remulla’s statements dangerously verge on prejudicial commentary. His call for the prosecution panel to “secure conviction” and to go “the extra mile to put behind bars all financiers of terrorism” sends a disquieting message—one that creates a widespread perception of guilt before final judgment. Needless to state, the resolution dated May 8, 2024 by the Task Force on Counter-Terrorism and Terrorism Financing, led by Senior Deputy State Prosecutor Peter Ong, may outline allegations against CERNET, but it does not conclusively prove guilt.

It is incumbent upon the DOJ to recall its ethical duty: prosecutors are entrusted not with securing convictions at all costs, but with ensuring that justice is served. This means upholding the principles of fairness, due process, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. It should be reminded that the use of fabricated evidence and the solicitation of false testimony, often sourced from alleged rebel returnees and anonymous witnesses procured by the NTF-ELCAC, constitute not only ethical violations but egregious affronts to justice.

Furthermore, Secretary Remulla’s inflammatory statements, such as “we will never stop running after terrorists” and “you will face extreme consequences,” send a chilling effect on CSOs pursuing legitimate humanitarian work. The ultimatum “either you are with us in safeguarding the welfare of our children and future generations or not at all”— is a dangerous dichotomy, a binary stance that serves only to intimidate and silence dissenting voices rather than promote genuine security.

By targeting organizations and individuals that have tirelessly served marginalized communities, the government’s counter-terrorism efforts risk exacerbating tensions and stifling civic engagement. The oppression of these humanitarian organizations under the guise of counter-terrorism not only undermines public trust in our justice system but also imperils the invaluable work these entities undertake to uplift vulnerable communities.

It is imperative that we remain vigilant and stand in solidarity with CERNET and all those unjustly accused in other financing terrorism cases. Our commitment to upholding rights and liberties demands a resolute rejection of repressive measures masquerading as a valid exercise of police power.###

Reference:
NUPL Public Information Desk
+639174316396

Read more

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Raven Kristine Racelis, Ralph Christian Manuel, Mecaella Sean Carl Capalar, and Dex Anderson Frogoso, represented by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) and the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), asked the Office of the Rector to reverse and set aside the separate resolutions issued by the UST Office for Student Affairs on October 2. They also sought an urgent stay of their suspensions and all related sanctions while the appeal is pending.

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL President Atty. Ephraim Cortez speaks outside the Court of Appeals on September 29, 2026, following the filing of a motion seeking reconsideration of the transfer to Cebu of the amparo and habeas data proceedings involving NUPL–Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and three development workers of the Paghida-et sa Kauswagan Development Group (PDG).

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

Under Trump’s Executive Order No. 14203, the designation subjects the ICC to US financial sanctions that threaten to restrict its access to American banks, technology, and other essential services. Given the United States’ influence over the global financial system, these restrictions could disrupt the Court’s operations, including investigations, witness protection, and even the delivery of assistance and reparations to victims.

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

The Philippine Air Force has no problem displaying weapons on a university campus, yet apparently cannot stomach sharp questions protests from students about military operations and civilian casualties. Even the University of Santo Tomas (UST) disciplinary resolution notes that PAF personnel themselves considered the students’ questions valid. What offended them, it seems, was the students’ supposedly rude manner.

Share This