On DOJ’s grandstanding narrative regarding financing terrorism charges vs. CERNET
The DOJ must be reminded of its ethical duty: prosecutors are entrusted not with securing convictions at all costs, but with ensuring that justice is served. This means upholding the principles of fairness, due process, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. The use of fabricated evidence and the solicitation of false testimony constitute not only ethical violations but egregious affronts to justice.
May 23, 2024
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The recent press statement issued by the Department of Justice (DOJ) concerning the filing of criminal charges for financing terrorism against Community Empowerment Resource Network, Inc. (CERNET) and its officers is a marching order to wield Republic Act No. 10168, the law ostensibly enacted to combat terrorism financing, as a blunt instrument against progressive civil society organizations (CSOs) and development workers.

While the DOJ has a mandate to prosecute crimes, the tone and substance of Justice Secretary Jesus Crispin C. Remulla’s statements dangerously verge on prejudicial commentary. His call for the prosecution panel to “secure conviction” and to go “the extra mile to put behind bars all financiers of terrorism” sends a disquieting message—one that creates a widespread perception of guilt before final judgment. Needless to state, the resolution dated May 8, 2024 by the Task Force on Counter-Terrorism and Terrorism Financing, led by Senior Deputy State Prosecutor Peter Ong, may outline allegations against CERNET, but it does not conclusively prove guilt.

It is incumbent upon the DOJ to recall its ethical duty: prosecutors are entrusted not with securing convictions at all costs, but with ensuring that justice is served. This means upholding the principles of fairness, due process, and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty. It should be reminded that the use of fabricated evidence and the solicitation of false testimony, often sourced from alleged rebel returnees and anonymous witnesses procured by the NTF-ELCAC, constitute not only ethical violations but egregious affronts to justice.

Furthermore, Secretary Remulla’s inflammatory statements, such as “we will never stop running after terrorists” and “you will face extreme consequences,” send a chilling effect on CSOs pursuing legitimate humanitarian work. The ultimatum “either you are with us in safeguarding the welfare of our children and future generations or not at all”— is a dangerous dichotomy, a binary stance that serves only to intimidate and silence dissenting voices rather than promote genuine security.

By targeting organizations and individuals that have tirelessly served marginalized communities, the government’s counter-terrorism efforts risk exacerbating tensions and stifling civic engagement. The oppression of these humanitarian organizations under the guise of counter-terrorism not only undermines public trust in our justice system but also imperils the invaluable work these entities undertake to uplift vulnerable communities.

It is imperative that we remain vigilant and stand in solidarity with CERNET and all those unjustly accused in other financing terrorism cases. Our commitment to upholding rights and liberties demands a resolute rejection of repressive measures masquerading as a valid exercise of police power.###

Reference:
NUPL Public Information Desk
+639174316396

Read more

Court Voids NTC Blocking Memo: Prior Restraint of Protected Speech Has No Place in a Democracy

Court Voids NTC Blocking Memo: Prior Restraint of Protected Speech Has No Place in a Democracy

We therefore call on the people to treat this ruling as a mandate to insist on a press that can report and publish without fear of being taken down, and on a citizenry free to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas across all frontiers. A democracy worthy of the name rests on people who are able to think, speak, debate, and dissent—with journalists and communities prepared to resist censorship and repression whenever they appear, online or offline.

STATEMENT: UPLM vows to continue the fight against warlordism and state-sanctioned impunity – MindaNews

The massacre and the massive corruption are fruits from the same poisonous tree. The tree is a system where power is treated as a personal inheritance, state resources as a private treasury, and the law as a weapon against the people rather than a shield for them. The warlord who orders a massacre to secure an election and the official who diverts billions from the public coffers operate on the same core belief: that they are above the law.

Do Not Rehabilitate Martial Law: Enrile Does Not Belong at the Libingan ng mga Bayani — NUPL

Do Not Mistake Criticism for Crime —NUPL

The recent statements from the DILG foreshadow more aggressive attempts to restrict public assembly ahead of the Baha sa Luneta 2.0 mobilization on November 30, where thousands are expected to gather once again to press for accountability. If the pattern holds, the State may again resort to brutality and violations of basic rights in an effort to suppress protected acts of discontent and dissent.

Share This