On the National Action Plan for Unity, Peace and Development (NAP-UPD): doubling down on a failed policy of repression
Until political power is democratized, land and wealth redistributed, national sovereignty asserted, and social justice realized, no policy—however artfully worded—will deliver peace. A whole-of-nation approach cannot dismantle a system that breeds resistance while preserving the very conditions that make such resistance necessary.
May 10, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

PRESS STATEMENT
May 10, 2025

Memorandum Circular No. 83, which adopts the National Action Plan for Unity, Peace and Development (NAP-UPD) 2025–2028, cements the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) as the lead implementing agency of this so-called “blueprint” for peace. Beneath the rhetoric of peace-building, it revives and reinforces a state apparatus long implicated in red-tagging, arbitrary arrests, enforced disappearances, and other forms of politically motivated persecution.

What is framed as a “whole-of-nation” approach is, in reality, a recycled counterinsurgency strategy—tried, failed, and repackaged. It sidesteps the root causes of armed conflict and instead relies on trumped-up charges, perjured testimony from state-recruited witnesses, staged reintegration of alleged “former rebels” in militarized communities, and the coordinated red-tagging of rights defenders and dissenters.

The NTF-ELCAC lies at the core of this machinery of repression. Thus, UN Special Rapporteurs Ian Fry and Irene Khan, citing its central role in red-tagging and attacks on civil society, have both called for its abolition. Even the Office of the Ombudsman found its former spokespersons guilty of conduct prejudicial to public service, acting on a complaint filed by the NUPL.

Secretary Eduardo Año’s latest statement calls for “turning off the Red taps”—a euphemism for targeting civil society with financial repression. This framing attempts to cast legal organizations as enemies of peace, when in fact it is the shrinking of civic space and the systematic attack on dissent that undermines genuine democratic dialogue. Año’s proposal to vet foreign funding, establish government-run accreditation systems, and surveil NGO operations is not a peace mechanism; it is a scheme for authoritarian control dressed in development speak.

Worse, the call to legislate “due diligence” mechanisms for NGOs is a thinly veiled threat. It seeks to create a legal basis for defunding groups that challenge the state’s narrative and hold it accountable for violations of people’s rights. This would further criminalize solidarity, penalize development work, and vilify principled resistance as “terrorism.”

The NAP-UPD offers no credible path to peace. It forecloses prospects for negotiation and evades the structural conditions that fuel armed conflict: landlessness, joblessness, repression, and systemic exclusion. The claim that a “whole-of-nation approach” can secure peace is as hollow as the promises of every counterinsurgency campaign that came before—from Vietnam-era civic action to martial law psywar operations. Each failed because they treated rebellion as a problem of perception, not of injustice.

Until political power is democratized, land and wealth redistributed, national sovereignty asserted, and social justice realized, no policy—however artfully worded—will deliver peace. A whole-of-nation approach cannot dismantle a system that breeds resistance while preserving the very conditions that make such resistance necessary. ###

#NoJusticeNoPeace

Read more

NUPL seeks amparo and habeas data protection for Negros people’s lawyer and PDG members; flags continuing threats vs. Isabela people’s lawyer despite existing protective writs

NUPL seeks amparo and habeas data protection for Negros people’s lawyer and PDG members; flags continuing threats vs. Isabela people’s lawyer despite existing protective writs

NUPL urged the Supreme Court to consider safeguards that protect lawyers and litigants and keep court processes safe, including convening a dialogue on effective protective mechanisms, issuing guidance when red-tagging and guilt-by-association narratives surface in court proceedings, and adopting clear protocols for responding to credible threats against counsel.

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

The enduring significance of EDSA rests on a simple truth: public spaces belong to the people. They must remain open as platforms for public discourse—robust, uninhibited, and free from the chilling effect of threats of dispersal or prosecution under a statute born of martial rule. EDSA stands as the people’s forum when they demand accountability and seek the fulfillment of the promise of People Power.

PROSECUTION IS TRIAL-READY, ICC SHOULD CONFIRM CHARGES AGAINST DUTERTE

PROSECUTION IS TRIAL-READY, ICC SHOULD CONFIRM CHARGES AGAINST DUTERTE

The hearings this week and the eventual trial are important for all Filipinos, as a way of composing a true and correct collective memory, and preserving a historical record of what should not be repeated again. The confirmation hearing is so important that victims and their lawyers, supporters, and advocates have travelled all the way to The Hague to be present during the hearings. We remain committed to seeking truth and justice for victims and for all people.

Share This