On the SC decision strengthening safeguards against unlawful searches
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) welcomes the Supreme Court’s firm reiteration in People v. Lucky Enriquez that search warrants must clearly and specifically identify the locations to be searched, as mandated by the Constitution. This decision is an affirmation of the fundamental rights of the people to be protected against unlawful searches and seizures.
January 7, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

PRESS STATEMENT
January 6, 2025


On the SC decision strengthening safeguards against unlawful searches

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) welcomes the Supreme Court’s firm reiteration in People v. Lucky Enriquez that search warrants must clearly and specifically identify the locations to be searched, as mandated by the Constitution. This decision is an affirmation of the fundamental rights of the people to be protected against unlawful searches and seizures.

As an organization that has handled numerous cases involving trumped-up charges of illegal possession of firearms, ammunition, and explosives—cases initiated by the planting of evidence—we recognize the critical importance of strict adherence to constitutional standards in the issuance of search warrants. Precision and clarity in search warrants serve as essential safeguards against abuse, ensuring that the legal system is not weaponized to target dissenters, activists, and vulnerable communities.

This decision also brings to mind the vindication of activists Reina Mae Nasino, Ram Carlo Bautista, and Alma Moran, whose illegal possession cases were dismissed when the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court’s denial of their motions to quash the defective search warrants used against them. As the appellate court underscored, “The subject Search Warrants indicated the wrong address and with the wrong description, which resulted [in] the improper implementation.” The inconsistencies in the search warrants, including the wrong address and description of the location, led to the suppression of evidence illegally obtained from them. Their case illustrates the grave consequences of vague and erroneous search warrants and the urgent need to hold the judiciary and law enforcement to the highest standards of constitutional compliance.

We hope that this decision will be robustly implemented, setting a precedent for accountability and fostering a culture of respect for human rights within the justice system. The NUPL remains steadfast in its commitment to advocating for the rights of the marginalized and opposing all forms of legal and systemic oppression. #


Reference:
Atty. Josalee Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

NUPL At Nineteen

NUPL At Nineteen

“There is nothing more fulfilling than to be devoted to defending our clients and people who work for social change. We shall be with them as they embark on militant actions, engage in empowering undertakings and in the process, strengthen and further unite their ranks. Our commitment to our struggling people is what makes us people’s lawyers.”

On the criminal charges of grave threat against VP Sara Duterte

On the criminal charges of grave threat against VP Sara Duterte

The validity of Sara Duterte’s indictment for grave threat is being questioned in light of the Supreme Court ruling in Ombudsman v. Court of Appeals (G.R. No. 146486, March 4, 2005). According to the ruling, an “impeachable officer cannot be criminally prosecuted for the same offenses which constitute grounds for impeachment”. In applying such ruling in relation to the indictment of Sara Duterte, the following points should be considered:

Share This