On the US Assault on Venezuela and the Erosion of International Law
We likewise call on lawyers’ organizations, human rights institutions, and all freedom-loving peoples to stand with the people of Venezuela and mobilize public pressure against this unlawful assault. The task before us is to resist imperial violence and the rule of force—firmly, collectively, and with an unambiguous commitment to the rule of law and the right of all peoples to determine their own future.
January 7, 2026
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

Press Statement
January 6, 2026

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) condemns the United States’ 3 January 2026 military operation in Venezuela—air strikes in Caracas followed by the forcible capture and removal of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro Moros and his wife, Cilia Flores, to New York to face U.S. criminal charges. This is a naked act of aggression, a familiar exercise of power driven by economic greed and contempt for international norms.

For decades, US oil corporations have openly coveted Venezuela’s vast petroleum reserves. The present assault strips away any remaining pretense. It is imperial greed in plain view—armed force deployed to secure what markets and diplomacy could not. The rhetoric of “security,” “law enforcement,” and “narco-terrorism” merely masks an old reality: control over strategic resources continues to shape US policy, especially against states that insist on an independent political and economic path.

This assault also lays bare the nature of alliances with an imperial power that treats nations as expendable instruments and treats their resources as spoils. Venezuela was met with overwhelming military force for refusing to submit to US political and economic dictates and for pursuing independent alliances. And if this is how the US deals with a government that refuses to submit, what protection exists for client regimes that depend on subservience? A puppet is useful only while the strings remain intact. Any sustained departure from US demands renders it expendable.

For the Philippines, the implications are stark. A government that readily opens the country’s territory, resources, and security policy to foreign use should take heed. Through arrangements such as the Visiting Forces Agreement (VFA) and the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement (EDCA), the Philippines is being positioned as a staging ground for US force projection in the region. Such compliance with US strategic interests buys only continued usefulness. When a client state ceases to be useful—or begins to diverge from the US agenda—political backing is withdrawn and punitive measures follow. The harm is borne by the people, not by those who struck the bargains.

Most alarming is the utter disregard for international law. The prohibition against the use of force, the principle of non-intervention, and respect for state sovereignty under the UN Charter are binding rules meant to restrain precisely this kind of unilateral violence. Their violation undermines the fragile legal order that smaller nations rely on, at the very least, for a minimum restraint on the use of force.

As peoples’ lawyers, we call on the international community—most especially the UN#—to act with the urgency this crisis demands. The UN system’s delayed and constrained response, shaped by the veto power of the strongest states, only deepens the long held reality that accountability under international law is applied unevenly when powerful states are involved.

We likewise call on lawyers’ organizations, human rights institutions, and all freedom-loving peoples to stand with the people of Venezuela and mobilize public pressure against this unlawful assault. The task before us is to resist imperial violence and the rule of force—firmly, collectively, and with an unambiguous commitment to the rule of law and the right of all peoples to determine their own future.

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

In the Service of the Filipino People

In the Service of the Filipino People

NUPL Vice President Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen and Secretary General Atty. Josa Deinla with lawyers from the Kennedy Human Rights Center and Kerry Kennedy at the Capitol in Washington D.C.

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

The Philippine government finds paths only to new methods of repression and enforces the peace of the grave at home. Human rights monitors, including Karapatan, document a continuing pattern of violence: extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and widespread attacks on rural communities. On April 19, state forces killed 19 people in Toboso, Negros Occidental, including civilians standing in solidarity with farmers asserting their land rights.

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

Share This