Special Rapporteur Irene Khan’s report exposes the legal architecture of repression
The Special Rapporteur’s report compels urgent legal and institutional measures to dismantle the structures of impunity that continue to subvert the rule of law. The Philippine government now faces a decisive choice: to maintain a legal order that instrumentalizes law as a tool of repression, or to finally fulfill its obligation to uphold democratic accountability and human rights.
June 19, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) welcomes and fully endorses the report of UN Special Rapporteur Irene Khan on freedom of opinion and expression in the Philippines. The report lays bare the ongoing weaponization of law against human rights defenders, journalists, and civil society actors who challenge state power and expose structural injustice.

As the Special Rapporteur correctly observes, acts of criticism and advocacy that interrogates the root causes of conflict are not terrorism; they are legitimate exercises of free expression protected under both the Philippine Constitution and international human rights law. But the state continues to collapse the distinction between dissent and criminality, deploying the language of counterterrorism to suppress political discourse and silence those who speak for the marginalized.

The cases of journalist Frenchie Mae Cumpio and rights defenders Mariel Domequil and Alexander Abinguna, whose defense we actively handle, demonstrate how legal processes themselves are manipulated to muzzle dissent. They remain in prolonged, pretrial detention on dubious charges, after being publicly vilified and red-tagged, in a pattern that strips legal protections of their substantive meaning. Such prosecutions reflect an entrenched strategy of state repression cloaked in legal form.

The blocking of Bulatlat under vague claims of terrorist affiliation further exposes how national security discourse is routinely exploited to justify censorship, undermine the right to information, and shield state abuse from public scrutiny.

We fully support the Special Rapporteur’s key recommendations: to amend the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020, whose vague and overbroad provisions undermine judicial oversight and enable warrantless arrests and expanded surveillance; to decriminalize libel, long used as a tool of political reprisal against journalists; to enact a robust Freedom of Information law grounded in maximum disclosure for the public interest; and to finally pass the long-overdue Human Rights Defenders Protection Act.

We likewise share the Special Rapporteur’s skepticism toward any proposal to rebrand the National Task Force to End Local Communist Armed Conflict (NTF-ELCAC) as a peace-building entity. Its institutional record as a central organ of red-tagging, harassment, and intimidation renders such a transformation implausible without a full reckoning with its role in past and ongoing violations.

The Special Rapporteur’s report compels urgent legal and institutional measures to dismantle the structures of impunity that continue to subvert the rule of law. The Philippine government now faces a decisive choice: to maintain a legal order that instrumentalizes law as a tool of repression, or to finally fulfill its obligation to uphold democratic accountability and human rights. ###

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

NUPL seeks amparo and habeas data protection for Negros people’s lawyer and PDG members; flags continuing threats vs. Isabela people’s lawyer despite existing protective writs

NUPL seeks amparo and habeas data protection for Negros people’s lawyer and PDG members; flags continuing threats vs. Isabela people’s lawyer despite existing protective writs

NUPL urged the Supreme Court to consider safeguards that protect lawyers and litigants and keep court processes safe, including convening a dialogue on effective protective mechanisms, issuing guidance when red-tagging and guilt-by-association narratives surface in court proceedings, and adopting clear protocols for responding to credible threats against counsel.

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

The enduring significance of EDSA rests on a simple truth: public spaces belong to the people. They must remain open as platforms for public discourse—robust, uninhibited, and free from the chilling effect of threats of dispersal or prosecution under a statute born of martial rule. EDSA stands as the people’s forum when they demand accountability and seek the fulfillment of the promise of People Power.

PROSECUTION IS TRIAL-READY, ICC SHOULD CONFIRM CHARGES AGAINST DUTERTE

PROSECUTION IS TRIAL-READY, ICC SHOULD CONFIRM CHARGES AGAINST DUTERTE

The hearings this week and the eventual trial are important for all Filipinos, as a way of composing a true and correct collective memory, and preserving a historical record of what should not be repeated again. The confirmation hearing is so important that victims and their lawyers, supporters, and advocates have travelled all the way to The Hague to be present during the hearings. We remain committed to seeking truth and justice for victims and for all people.

Share This