Walk the talk, Mr. President : Show justice with action, not empty rhetoric
Speeches filled with rhetoric about the Constitution and the rule of law are not enough. If this administration is sincere about justice reaching the margins, it must demonstrate that sincerity by ceasing the systematic harassment of human rights defenders, ending the red-tagging of lawyers and activists, and addressing the socio-economic issues that continue to oppress the underprivileged. Without these actions, the President’s words will remain little more than political theater, far removed from the reality of the people he claims to serve.
January 31, 2025
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

We, the National Union of People’s Lawyers (NUPL), are compelled to respond to President Ferdinand “Bongbong” Marcos Jr.’s recent statement at the Integrated Bar of the Philippines (IBP) National Convention, where he invoked the importance of ensuring that justice reaches the underserved, unseen, and unheard. While his words may resonate as noble, they are hollow without meaningful action.

Justice cannot merely be a concept spoken from podiums; it must be evident in governance, in laws, and in the treatment of those who seek to defend the people. His administration has failed to deliver on this promise, instead presiding over an environment where dissent is criminalized, human rights defenders are persecuted, and legal remedies are denied to the poor.

When the President says, “The law must serve all Filipinos—not just a privileged few,” we are reminded of the dissonance between this vision and the reality on the ground. The underprivileged face injustice daily, yet when they organize, protest, or defend their rights, they are met with fabricated charges, arbitrary arrests, and asset freezes disguised as counter-terrorism measures. Meanwhile, political allies accused of corruption and abuse continue to enjoy impunity. Justice for the privileged few appears swift and accommodating, but for the ordinary worker, farmer, urban poor resident, or activist, it is slow, selective, and punitive.

The President claims that his administration is committed to fairness and impartiality, but fairness cannot exist in a country where Mary Jane Veloso, a poor mother and a trafficking victim, continues to languish in jail. It is telling that the administration, which boasts of its commitment to the marginalized, cannot act decisively to free Mary Jane, all while protecting those in power who face no real consequences for their actions.

Justice also extends beyond courtrooms. Where is the President’s urgency to address the rising cost of basic goods, soaring inflation, stagnant wages, and the daily suffering of workers and commuters trapped in a broken public transportation system? These socio-economic hardships are not just issues of policy failure—they are issues of justice.

The poor are further burdened by environmental destruction caused by decades of neoliberal policies that have prioritized corporate profit and foreign investment over genuine and sustainable development. Land grabbing, deforestation, destructive mining, and reclamation projects have not only displaced marginalized communities but also stripped them of their means of survival, violating their most basic rights.

Even the constitutional commitment to accountability is being undermined as the government does nothing to hold Vice President Sara Duterte accountable, despite glaring questions about corruption and her controversial use of confidential funds. Justice, fairness, and the rule of law cannot flourish when those in the highest offices are shielded from scrutiny, while those fighting for the rights of the oppressed are treated as criminals.

Speeches filled with rhetoric about the Constitution and the rule of law are not enough. If this administration is sincere about justice reaching the margins, it must demonstrate that sincerity by ceasing the systematic harassment of human rights defenders, ending the red-tagging of lawyers and activists, and addressing the socio-economic issues that continue to oppress the underprivileged. Without these actions, the President’s words will remain little more than political theater, far removed from the reality of the people he claims to serve. #

Reference:
Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
+639174316396

Read more

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Raven Kristine Racelis, Ralph Christian Manuel, Mecaella Sean Carl Capalar, and Dex Anderson Frogoso, represented by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) and the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), asked the Office of the Rector to reverse and set aside the separate resolutions issued by the UST Office for Student Affairs on October 2. They also sought an urgent stay of their suspensions and all related sanctions while the appeal is pending.

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL President Atty. Ephraim Cortez speaks outside the Court of Appeals on September 29, 2026, following the filing of a motion seeking reconsideration of the transfer to Cebu of the amparo and habeas data proceedings involving NUPL–Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and three development workers of the Paghida-et sa Kauswagan Development Group (PDG).

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

Under Trump’s Executive Order No. 14203, the designation subjects the ICC to US financial sanctions that threaten to restrict its access to American banks, technology, and other essential services. Given the United States’ influence over the global financial system, these restrictions could disrupt the Court’s operations, including investigations, witness protection, and even the delivery of assistance and reparations to victims.

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

The Philippine Air Force has no problem displaying weapons on a university campus, yet apparently cannot stomach sharp questions protests from students about military operations and civilian casualties. Even the University of Santo Tomas (UST) disciplinary resolution notes that PAF personnel themselves considered the students’ questions valid. What offended them, it seems, was the students’ supposedly rude manner.

Share This