COOPERATION WITH ICC BY PH GOVERNMENT IS JUST AND LEGAL: Both Marcoses and Dutertes accountable for extra-judicial killings
“Its withdrawal shall not affect any cooperation with the Court in connection with criminal investigations and proceedings in relation to which the withdrawing State had a duty to cooperate and which were commenced prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective, nor shall it prejudice in any way the continued consideration of any matter which was already under consideration by the Court prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective.”
January 24, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The Philippines’ cooperation with the International Criminal Court (ICC) on matters pertaining to the ongoing investigation into crimes against humanity in the Philippines is mandated by the Rome Statute. Notwithstanding the withdrawal of the Philippines in March 2019, there are continuing obligations under Article 127 of the statute; to quote:

“Its withdrawal shall not affect any cooperation with the Court in connection with criminal investigations and proceedings in relation to which the withdrawing State had a duty to cooperate and which were commenced prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective, nor shall it prejudice in any way the continued consideration of any matter which was already under consideration by the Court prior to the date on which the withdrawal became effective.”

The Justice secretary’s position is certainly consistent with the Rome Statute, and simply just for thousands of victims of the “war on drugs”. The Marcos administration is beholden to investigate and prosecute extra-judicial killings and other such crimes. It is already haunted and blood-stained by the previous Marcos administration’s record of massive human rights violations, and it cannot afford to overlook this one.

Rodrigo Duterte, his legal advisor Salvador Panelo, and other supporters should not baselessly deny that Duterte cannot be taken to the court for trial. They look pathetic with their denials: that the court has no jurisdiction, that Duterte is not responsible, that the killings do not amount to crimes against humanity, and most ridiculous, that the killings did not occur. They bank on Nazi propaganda, that a lie repeated over and over becomes truth.

The ICC is moving as methodically as it can to uncover what really happened here. It has a current live portal for witness appeals in the situation in the Philippines, signaling a more open approach in its investigation. Considering the context: last month, the court granted warrants of arrest for the situation in Palestine; yesterday, the prosecutor applied for warrants of arrest for the situation in Afghanistan. We hope the next development will be in ours. See you in the ICC.

Reference:

Atty. Kristina Conti
Counsel for victims; National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers-National Capital Region
+639298207000 | nupl2007@gmail.com

Read more

In the Service of the Filipino People

In the Service of the Filipino People

NUPL Vice President Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen and Secretary General Atty. Josa Deinla with lawyers from the Kennedy Human Rights Center and Kerry Kennedy at the Capitol in Washington D.C.

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

The Philippine government finds paths only to new methods of repression and enforces the peace of the grave at home. Human rights monitors, including Karapatan, document a continuing pattern of violence: extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and widespread attacks on rural communities. On April 19, state forces killed 19 people in Toboso, Negros Occidental, including civilians standing in solidarity with farmers asserting their land rights.

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

Share This