NUPL welcomes denial of asset preservation order vs. Leyte Center for Development and Empowerment and its officers
We reiterate that the weaponization of terror laws and financial sanctions as tools of repression, even under the pretext of complying with Financial Action Task Force recommendations, has no place in a democratic society.
February 25, 2026
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

PRESS STATEMENT
21 February 2026

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) welcomes the court ruling lifting the Provisional Asset Preservation Order (PAPO) and denying the government’s request for an Asset Preservation Order (APO) in the civil forfeiture case involving the Leyte Center for Development and Empowerment (LCDE), its Executive Director Jazmin Aguisanda-Jerusalem, and its officers, who are clients of NUPL.

The order, issued yesterday by the Regional Trial Court of Manila, Branch 28, affirms that asset-freezing measures cannot rest on conjecture or unsupported allegations, but must be grounded on competent evidence establishing probable cause. As the ruling noted, the petition failed to credibly link the questioned bank accounts and transactions to unlawful activity under the Anti-Money Laundering Act (AMLA) and the Terrorism Financing Prevention and Suppression Act (TFPSA). The court likewise pointed to serious gaps in the financial investigation, including an unreconciled timeline, the absence of reliable proof of alleged organizational links, and the failure to meaningfully examine the legitimate nature of the NGO’s work and funding sources.

The denial of the APO underscores our clients’ firm and categorical repudiation of fabricated accusations of terrorism financing, which have been used to intimidate and stigmatize legitimate development and humanitarian initiatives.

LCDE works with communities in Eastern Visayas, including underserved and neglected areas repeatedly devastated by disasters. Freezing its funds and disrupting its operations do not serve the public interest. Instead, such measures threaten to disrupt humanitarian assistance, disaster risk reduction, and rehabilitation efforts for communities with the least access to basic services and protection.

While we welcome the lifting of the PAPO and the denial of the APO, we note that the petition was not dismissed and the case has been set for pre-trial and trial on the merits. NUPL will continue to represent LCDE, Ms. Aguisanda-Jerusalem, and the other respondents, and will vigorously defend their rights and the legitimacy of their work. ###

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Read more

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

The enduring significance of EDSA rests on a simple truth: public spaces belong to the people. They must remain open as platforms for public discourse—robust, uninhibited, and free from the chilling effect of threats of dispersal or prosecution under a statute born of martial rule. EDSA stands as the people’s forum when they demand accountability and seek the fulfillment of the promise of People Power.

PROSECUTION IS TRIAL-READY, ICC SHOULD CONFIRM CHARGES AGAINST DUTERTE

PROSECUTION IS TRIAL-READY, ICC SHOULD CONFIRM CHARGES AGAINST DUTERTE

The hearings this week and the eventual trial are important for all Filipinos, as a way of composing a true and correct collective memory, and preserving a historical record of what should not be repeated again. The confirmation hearing is so important that victims and their lawyers, supporters, and advocates have travelled all the way to The Hague to be present during the hearings. We remain committed to seeking truth and justice for victims and for all people.

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

Hands off NUPL Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and PDG development workers! – NUPL

These attacks against Atty. Gorgonio and his clients, whom the military has labeled as “high value individuals,” are part of the continuing weaponization of counterterrorism measures against development workers and human rights defenders. They create a chilling climate meant to intimidate and hinder human rights lawyers from independently performing their duties and providing legal services without fear.

Share This