Facebook removes NUPL post again
The takedowns may seem arbitrary, but they can be seen as part of a larger pattern where activism, advocacy and dissent are disproportionately affected by social media moderation.
September 9, 2024
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

In yet another move that defies explanation, Facebook has taken down a post by NUPL Secretary General Josalee Deinla, this time citing its Community Standards on spam. The post in question shared a link to the NUPL’s “Message to the 2024 Bar Examinees” and included the text: “Join NUPL!” Facebook claims the link was designed to deceive or mislead users—a curious accusation for an organization committed to the promotion and defense of human rights.

The link, of course, was anything but scheming. It is a simple call to future lawyers to join the ranks of those who champion justice for the marginalized or to consider people’s lawyering as a career path. But Facebook deemed it unfit for their platform, even though it does not serve the “lucrative industry” of spam that thrives on trickery and empty clicks.

It is not the first time NUPL’s voice has been silenced by the tech giant’s heavy-handed moderation. Last year, Facebook “mistakenly” took down the NUPL page where its indignation rally on the killing of Abra lawyer Saniata Liwliwa Gonzales Alzate was filmed live. That mistake, like this one, raises troubling questions about whose voices are heard and whose are erased in the algorithm’s cold and careless sweep. The takedowns may seem arbitrary, but they can be seen as part of a larger pattern where activism, advocacy and dissent are disproportionately affected by social media moderation.

The removal has been appealed to Facebook. But one has to wonder—how many more “mistakes” will it take before the lines between oversight and suppression blur beyond recognition? #

Read more

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Four UST students appeal sanctions over PAF exhibit: NUPL and PILC ask Rector to stay penalties and reverse OSA resolutions

Raven Kristine Racelis, Ralph Christian Manuel, Mecaella Sean Carl Capalar, and Dex Anderson Frogoso, represented by the National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) and the Public Interest Law Center (PILC), asked the Office of the Rector to reverse and set aside the separate resolutions issued by the UST Office for Student Affairs on October 2. They also sought an urgent stay of their suspensions and all related sanctions while the appeal is pending.

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL seeks to keep Gorgonio amparo case in Manila

NUPL President Atty. Ephraim Cortez speaks outside the Court of Appeals on September 29, 2026, following the filing of a motion seeking reconsideration of the transfer to Cebu of the amparo and habeas data proceedings involving NUPL–Negros Chairperson Atty. Rey Gorgonio and three development workers of the Paghida-et sa Kauswagan Development Group (PDG).

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

US sanctions against the ICC: Imperial power in the service of impunity

Under Trump’s Executive Order No. 14203, the designation subjects the ICC to US financial sanctions that threaten to restrict its access to American banks, technology, and other essential services. Given the United States’ influence over the global financial system, these restrictions could disrupt the Court’s operations, including investigations, witness protection, and even the delivery of assistance and reparations to victims.

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

PAF’s Thin Skin Is No Ground for Punishing Student Dissent

The Philippine Air Force has no problem displaying weapons on a university campus, yet apparently cannot stomach sharp questions protests from students about military operations and civilian casualties. Even the University of Santo Tomas (UST) disciplinary resolution notes that PAF personnel themselves considered the students’ questions valid. What offended them, it seems, was the students’ supposedly rude manner.

Share This