On Jeffrey Celiz’s asylum bid: there is no refuge from accountability
There must be no sanctuary for lies and no refuge from accountability.
April 22, 2025
NUPL
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.
Photo courtesy of Teddy Casiño

We join activist organizations and human rights advocates in condemning Jeffrey Celiz’s attempt to seek asylum.

Celiz is not a dissident seeking refuge from political persecution. By his own record, he is a military asset and paid propagandist attempting to evade accountability for years of systematic red-tagging, disinformation, and public vilification of activists and rights defenders. Now, confronted with legal reckoning, he recasts himself as the persecuted, insulting those who have been harassed or imprisoned, and dishonoring the memory of those who were disappeared or killed for real acts of dissent.

Celiz is currently in the United States while facing two civil suits for damages filed by Dr. Carol Araullo, chairperson emeritus of Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (BAYAN), and Teddy Casiño, BAYAN chair and former Bayan Muna Party-list representative. These cases, pending before the Regional Trial Courts of Quezon City and Makati, respectively, seek to hold him to account for deliberate, baseless, and malicious red-tagging—an act that, in this country, carries consequences far beyond reputational harm.

In a separate civil action, the Quezon City RTC Branch 306 ordered Celiz and former NTF-ELCAC spokesperson Lorraine Badoy to pay P2.07 million in damages to journalist Atom Araullo. The court held that their actions violated provisions of the Civil Code protecting individual rights, personal dignity and human relations. The court was unequivocal: “Red-tagging is, by itself, a manifestation of bad faith. By engaging in red-tagging, the defendants acted grossly and recklessly without regard for truth.”

Freedom of expression is not a shield for impunity. While the Constitution upholds this right, the Civil Code provides clear limits: when speech is used to harm, defame, or intimidate others, it becomes actionable. What Celiz practiced was not public discourse in a democracy; it was vilification as state policy. His speech did not inform and debate—it incited and endangered.

Asylum, in international law, is a shield for the persecuted, not a hiding place for the persecutors. If Celiz now fears reprisal, it is not for having spoken truth to power, but for years of trying to silence those who did.

There must be no sanctuary for lies and no refuge from accountability. ###

Reference:

Atty. Josalee S. Deinla
NUPL Secretary General
+639174316396

Photo by Bulatlat

Read more

DEFEND WOMEN’S DIGNITY, FIGHT MISOGYNY, AND RESIST ALL FORMS OF ABUSE AND OPPRESSION

DEFEND WOMEN’S DIGNITY, FIGHT MISOGYNY, AND RESIST ALL FORMS OF ABUSE AND OPPRESSION

There can be no genuine equality while women remain targets of abuse, exploitation, and contempt, and while poor and working women continue to suffer the combined violence of patriarchy and economic oppression. To defend women’s rights is to fight misogyny in all its forms, demand accountability from those who perpetuate it, and challenge the social order that keeps women vulnerable, silenced, and exploited.

NUPL seeks amparo and habeas data protection for Negros people’s lawyer and PDG members; flags continuing threats vs. Isabela people’s lawyer despite existing protective writs

NUPL seeks amparo and habeas data protection for Negros people’s lawyer and PDG members; flags continuing threats vs. Isabela people’s lawyer despite existing protective writs

NUPL urged the Supreme Court to consider safeguards that protect lawyers and litigants and keep court processes safe, including convening a dialogue on effective protective mechanisms, issuing guidance when red-tagging and guilt-by-association narratives surface in court proceedings, and adopting clear protocols for responding to credible threats against counsel.

NUPL Condemns Quezon City “Safe City” Crackdown as Anti-Poor, Legally Dubious, and Abusive

EDSA at 40: The People’s Forum

The enduring significance of EDSA rests on a simple truth: public spaces belong to the people. They must remain open as platforms for public discourse—robust, uninhibited, and free from the chilling effect of threats of dispersal or prosecution under a statute born of martial rule. EDSA stands as the people’s forum when they demand accountability and seek the fulfillment of the promise of People Power.

Share This