System error or systematic fraud? Time for a manual recount
When trust in the system breaks down, transparency must take its place. The people have the right to know their votes were counted truthfully. Without credibility, there is no legitimacy.
May 16, 2025
The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers is a nationwide voluntary association of human rights lawyers in the Philippines, committed to the defense, protection, and promotion of human rights, especially of the poor and the oppressed.

The National Union of Peoples’ Lawyers (NUPL) raises the alarm over mounting evidence that the 2025 elections may have been compromised. At the center of this crisis is the Commission on Elections’ (COMELEC) use of software version 3.5.0 for vote counting, a version that was not formally certified as required by law.

The only version with public documentation of certification and audit is 3.4.0, signed off by Pro V&V on April 30, 2025. Version 3.5.0, however, was the one actually deployed during the elections.

COMELEC’s explanations have shifted over time. On May 11, it claimed that version 3.5.0 was functionally identical to version 3.4.0, with the only change being a version label updated after the final certification. This implied that the deployed software, though renamed, was still covered by the earlier certification. But by May 12, COMELEC and Pro V&V issued a new explanation: that version 3.5.0 had in fact been subjected to the final trusted build process, and the changes were based on final updates submitted by Miru Systems on March 28. A Final Source Code Review Report was promised, but has yet to be released.

These shifting narratives raise concerns not only about compliance with the Automated Election System Law but also about COMELEC’s obligation to ensure full public transparency.

Meanwhile, across the country, voters reported “overvoting,” mismatched digital receipts, machine malfunctions, and missing names from voter rolls. In Quezon City, for instance, official COMELEC data shows 804 ballots cast in a precinct where only 767 voters were recorded. Gabriela Women’s Party lost 50,000 votes in the course of transmission.

These are not isolated glitches. When viewed alongside the uncertified software version, they form a troubling pattern that undermines the credibility of the elections.

COMELEC must be held accountable not just for technical lapses, but for failing to uphold its legal obligation to ensure transparency and integrity in the electoral process. Its explanations have been contradictory, incomplete, and ultimately unsatisfactory.

We call for a full, precinct-level manual count of votes and an independent audit of COMELEC’s software versions, review protocols, and chain of custody.

When trust in the system breaks down, transparency must take its place. The people have the right to know their votes were counted truthfully. Without credibility, there is no legitimacy.###

Read more

In the Service of the Filipino People

In the Service of the Filipino People

NUPL Vice President Atty. Angelo Karlo Guillen and Secretary General Atty. Josa Deinla with lawyers from the Kennedy Human Rights Center and Kerry Kennedy at the Capitol in Washington D.C.

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

Philippine Defeat in UN Security Council Bid Shows Human Rights Record Cannot Be Ignored

The Philippine government finds paths only to new methods of repression and enforces the peace of the grave at home. Human rights monitors, including Karapatan, document a continuing pattern of violence: extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances, arbitrary arrests, and widespread attacks on rural communities. On April 19, state forces killed 19 people in Toboso, Negros Occidental, including civilians standing in solidarity with farmers asserting their land rights.

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

On the Denial of the Petition Challenging the Terrorist Designation of Cordillera Peoples Alliance Leaders and the Constitutionality of the Anti-Terrorism Act

The petitioners, all respected advocates for indigenous peoples’ rights and self-determination, sought judicial review of their designation as terrorists by the Anti-Terrorism Council (ATC) in 2023. Their petition constituted the first—and, to our knowledge, remains the only—as-applied constitutional challenge to the ATC’s power to designate individuals and organizations as terrorists under the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2020.

Share This